<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Irony of Project Management:  the practitioner’s view</title>
	<atom:link href="http://francoisaubin.com/2008/02/18/the-irony-project-management-the-practitioner%e2%80%99s-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://francoisaubin.com/2008/02/18/the-irony-project-management-the-practitioner%e2%80%99s-view/</link>
	<description>Ensure useful and usable solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 15:56:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CypeCremn</title>
		<link>http://francoisaubin.com/2008/02/18/the-irony-project-management-the-practitioner%e2%80%99s-view/#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>CypeCremn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://francoisaubin.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-653</guid>
		<description>NubyErrobre
&lt;a href=&quot;http://avshedvvvssk.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;af5d&lt;/a&gt;
voxExpots
&lt;a href=&quot;http://avsckisjk.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;awpg&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NubyErrobre<br />
<a href="http://avshedvvvssk.com" rel="nofollow">af5d</a><br />
voxExpots<br />
<a href="http://avsckisjk.com" rel="nofollow">awpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francois Aubin</title>
		<link>http://francoisaubin.com/2008/02/18/the-irony-project-management-the-practitioner%e2%80%99s-view/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>Francois Aubin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 09:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://francoisaubin.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-502</guid>
		<description>I agree with Mr. Gilbert. PMI in itself is not responsible for this situation. On the other hand, the real success factors is in the execution, the &#039;&#039;How?&#039;&#039;

I will take golf as example. On paper, the strategy is quite simple. 
1. You use the driver for driving
2. You make approaches with the appropriate iron
3. You finish on the green with the potter 

While the strategy is simple, in Golf,  the execution is the real challenge. It takes years of practice, reading, lessons and hard work to be just good.

Similarly event if the strategy in PM is simple, the real challenge in getting end-user involvement where the goal is to ensure proper user&#039;s requirements is the execution. Getting the exact user&#039;s requirement, takes years of practice, training and hard work in human factors. In human factors (cognitive ergonomics), the main techniques to get proper use requirement  ( the putter) is the task analysis. My new staff  with proper training (usually PH.D) become good at it after 10 years of practice and coaching.

By the way,  most people in the  (IT) industry are not aware of cognitive ergonomics. They plan for a high degree of uncertainties in user&#039;s requirements.

Getting clear business objectives is event a bigger challenge. What is the competitive environment, what is the internal current situation, what are the business goals. It takes in my view a minimum of 10 to 15 years of consulting practice and many skills. An even bigger challenge is how to communicate those findings.

An son on. I think I will have to write a complete post on the key success factors.

Francois</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mr. Gilbert. PMI in itself is not responsible for this situation. On the other hand, the real success factors is in the execution, the &#8221;How?&#8221;</p>
<p>I will take golf as example. On paper, the strategy is quite simple.<br />
1. You use the driver for driving<br />
2. You make approaches with the appropriate iron<br />
3. You finish on the green with the potter </p>
<p>While the strategy is simple, in Golf,  the execution is the real challenge. It takes years of practice, reading, lessons and hard work to be just good.</p>
<p>Similarly event if the strategy in PM is simple, the real challenge in getting end-user involvement where the goal is to ensure proper user&#8217;s requirements is the execution. Getting the exact user&#8217;s requirement, takes years of practice, training and hard work in human factors. In human factors (cognitive ergonomics), the main techniques to get proper use requirement  ( the putter) is the task analysis. My new staff  with proper training (usually PH.D) become good at it after 10 years of practice and coaching.</p>
<p>By the way,  most people in the  (IT) industry are not aware of cognitive ergonomics. They plan for a high degree of uncertainties in user&#8217;s requirements.</p>
<p>Getting clear business objectives is event a bigger challenge. What is the competitive environment, what is the internal current situation, what are the business goals. It takes in my view a minimum of 10 to 15 years of consulting practice and many skills. An even bigger challenge is how to communicate those findings.</p>
<p>An son on. I think I will have to write a complete post on the key success factors.</p>
<p>Francois</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl M Gilbert</title>
		<link>http://francoisaubin.com/2008/02/18/the-irony-project-management-the-practitioner%e2%80%99s-view/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl M Gilbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://francoisaubin.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-501</guid>
		<description>How typical!!!

Good article...

I often see this kind of situations... Project management is still in many organizations an &quot;accidental&quot; profession/discipline... I&#039;m pretty sure this PM never followed a practical PM course... It&#039;s very common.

Here are the key success factors (by priority) in project management:
1- End-user involvement
2- Top Management support/buy-in
3- Clear business objectives (ouchhhh)
4- Proper planning
5- Realistic expectations (t/$)
6- Competent team/PM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How typical!!!</p>
<p>Good article&#8230;</p>
<p>I often see this kind of situations&#8230; Project management is still in many organizations an &#8220;accidental&#8221; profession/discipline&#8230; I&#8217;m pretty sure this PM never followed a practical PM course&#8230; It&#8217;s very common.</p>
<p>Here are the key success factors (by priority) in project management:<br />
1- End-user involvement<br />
2- Top Management support/buy-in<br />
3- Clear business objectives (ouchhhh)<br />
4- Proper planning<br />
5- Realistic expectations (t/$)<br />
6- Competent team/PM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gravel</title>
		<link>http://francoisaubin.com/2008/02/18/the-irony-project-management-the-practitioner%e2%80%99s-view/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gravel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://francoisaubin.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-500</guid>
		<description>Very good and very revealing of the inertia within IT departments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good and very revealing of the inertia within IT departments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://francoisaubin.com/2008/02/18/the-irony-project-management-the-practitioner%e2%80%99s-view/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://francoisaubin.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-499</guid>
		<description>It looks like another client saved considerable pain by having been lucky enough to hire someone willing to speak out rather than just going along with the brief.  I am often concerned by the extent to which people edit what they say before it has even been spoken.  That way people become accustomed to continuing down a narrow path failing to see opportunities all around, or failing to undertake the due diligence needed to move beyond satisfactory to excellent.
...Geoff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like another client saved considerable pain by having been lucky enough to hire someone willing to speak out rather than just going along with the brief.  I am often concerned by the extent to which people edit what they say before it has even been spoken.  That way people become accustomed to continuing down a narrow path failing to see opportunities all around, or failing to undertake the due diligence needed to move beyond satisfactory to excellent.<br />
&#8230;Geoff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
